- Clark.com Biweekly Newsletter (Mondays and Thursdays)
- Posts
- Clark Biweekly 4 28 25
Clark Biweekly 4 28 25
Advertisement
We have been hearing the word "tariff" quite a bit lately. But what about "pink" tariffs? Find out what this is and how it may impact you further down this email.
đľ Todayâs Top Stories
Weâve identified remote jobs that donât require a degree and pay well â including one position that allows you to earn more than $75,000 per year. Read more. |
You donât want to get conned out of your hard-earned money. Find out the most common scams targeting seniors and what you can do to prevent these schemes. Read more. |
Clark is an expert on finding good deals on a hotel room. Why does he exclusively book refundable rooms? Read more. |
Here are some common unexpected expenses â and how to prepare your wallet for them. Weâre talking a cracked windshield, a busted water heater and more. Read more. |
New vehicle prices have stayed stubbornly high. But used cars have gone down in price. Clark is fired up about the used car market right now, especially for cars of this specific age. Read more. |
đ ď¸ Todayâs Current Mortgage Rates
According to Freddie Mac, 30-year mortgage rates are 6.81% and 15-year rates are 5.94% as of April 24, 2025. The following chart shows the 30-year mortgage rate trend over the last year.

đ Why âPinkâ Tariffs Exist
If youâre a woman, tariffs are hitting your clothing harder than menâs clothing.
Thatâs right: tariffs are about 3% higher for womenâs clothing and shoes vs. menâs.
Called âpink tariffsâ by some, the Progressive Policy Institute analyzed more than 700 clothing tariff lines and found that womenâs clothing faced an average tariff of 16.7% compared to 13.6% for men.
Unisex options donât amount to a workaround, as theyâre automatically tariffed the same as womenâs options.
According to Forbes: âCurrently, in the U.S., imported consumer goods are categorized and taxed by classification. Clothing is a common example, as specific textile codes can, and often do, dictate a higher tax rate for an item thatâs classified as a womanâs article of clothing.â
The difference amounts to $2.8 billion in extra costs for womenâs items each year.
According to CNN, the gap varies between items. Womenâs underwear gets hit with a 12.8% tariff, according to the most recent available data, vs. 8.6% for menâs underwear.
CNN also says that itâs a vestige from the 1930s and â40s when America influenced global free trade. At the time, womenâs clothing was a cottage industry, and leaders spent more time lobbying for lower tariffs on menâs clothing.
âSteve Madden, Asics, Columbia Sportswear and other companies sued the government in 2007 to strike down the tariff policy, but the suit failed because courts ruled that the tariff gaps were not designed to be discriminatory,â CNN wrote.
đ Stat of the Day
đą 600 tons: The weight of the iPhones (as many as 1.5 million) that Apple had shipped from India to the United States earlier this month with tariffs looming. The on-again, off-again nature of some of the tariffs is unpredictable, but Apple did its best to protect itself against potential pain points with a huge shipment.
đ°ď¸ Deal Alert: Todayâs Top Deals
đď¸ Podcast
Itâs time for "Clark Stinks!" Christa reads the latest "Clark Stinks!" submissions and Clark responds. Also, our Consumer Action Center received several calls from consumers that Fidelity was trying to sell them annuities! Clark explains whatâs going on and why you need to think twice before you listen to the pitch.
âď¸ Need Money Help?
The Team Clark Consumer Action Center is a free helpline that can help you navigate your money questions. Call 636-492-5275. Visit clark.com/cac for more information.
Advertisement
Did You Enjoy Todayâs Newsletter?Let us know what you think so we can better serve you! |







